| Surgery Section - Emerging Surgical Treatments
for Glaucoma
| Topic: Emerging Surgical
Treatments for Glaucoma |
Date of Origin: 04/01/2008 |
| Section: Surgery |
Policy No: 164 |
| Approved Date: 10/14/2008 |
Effective Date: 05/01/2009 |
| Next Review Date: 5/2010 |
|
| |
IMPORTANT REMINDER
This Medical Policy has been developed through consideration of medical necessity,
generally accepted standards of medical practice, and review of medical literature
and government approval status.
Benefit determinations should be based in all cases on
the applicable contract language. To the extent there are any conflicts
between these guidelines and the contract language, the contract language will
control.
The purpose of medical policy is to provide a guide to coverage. Medical Policy
is not intended to dictate to providers how to practice medicine. Providers
are expected to exercise their medical judgment in providing the most appropriate
care.
Description
Surgical procedures for glaucoma aim to reduce intraocular pressure
(IOP) resulting from impaired aqueous humor drainage in the trabecular
meshwork and/or Schlemm’s canal. In the primary (conventional)
outflow pathway from the eye, aqueous humor passes through the trabecular
meshwork, enters a space lined with endothelial cells (Schlemm’s
canal) and then drains into the aqueous veins. Increases in resistance
in the trabecular meshwork and/or the inner wall of Schlemm’s canal
can disrupt the balance of aqueous humor inflow and outflow, resulting
in an increase in IOP and glaucoma risk.
Surgical intervention may be indicated in patients with glaucoma when
the target IOP can not be reached pharmacologically. Trabeculectomy (guarded
filtration surgery) is the most established surgical procedure for glaucoma,
allowing aqueous humor to directly enter the subconjunctival space. This
procedure creates a subconjunctival reservoir which can effectively reduce
IOP, but commonly results in filtering “blebs” on the eye,
and is associated with numerous complications (e.g., leaks or bleb-related
endophthalmitis) and long-term failure. The Trabectome™ is a recently
developed electrocautery device with irrigation and aspiration designed
to selectively remove trabecular meshwork and Schlemm’s canal inner
wall.
Canaloplasty involves dilation and tension of Schlemm’s canal
with a suture loop between the inner wall of the canal and the trabecular
meshwork. Canaloplasty utilizes the iTrack™ illuminated microcatheter
(iScience Interventional) to access and dilate the entire length of Schlemm’s
canal and to pass the suture loop through the canal. Other surgical procedures
(not addressed in this policy) include trabecular laser ablation, deep
sclerectomy, which removes the outer wall of Schlemm’s canal and
excises deep sclera and peripheral cornea, and viscocanalostomy, which
unroofs and dilates Schlemm’s canal without penetrating the trabecular
meshwork or anterior chamber.
A variety of trabecular shunts are being developed as minimally penetrating
methods to drain aqueous humor from the anterior chamber into an ocular
reservoir. These include the iStent (Glaukos), which is inserted into
the end of Schlemm’s canal by an internal (through the cornea and
anterior chamber) or external approach (through the subconjunctiva);
the EyePass Bi-Directional Glaucoma Implant (GMP Companies), which is
a Y-shaped shunt in which the 2 arms are placed into both lumina of Schlemm’s
canal ab externo; and the Solx DeepLight Gold Micro-Shunt (OccuLogix),
which shunts aqueous humor between the anterior chamber and the suprachoroidal
space. Since aqueous humor outflow is pressure dependent, the pressure
in the reservoir and venous system are critical for reaching the target
IOP. Therefore, some devices may be unable to reduce IOP below the pressure
of the distal outflow system used, e.g., below 15 mm Hg. Each type of
shunt and approach to insertion may produce different results and are
thus viewed as distinct interventions.
The iTrack (iScience Interventional) received 510(k) marketing clearance
from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2004 as a surgical
ophthalmic microcannula which is indicated for the general purpose of “fluid
infusion and aspiration, as well as illumination, during surgery.” The
iStent and Eyepass are currently in FDA trials (the iStent trial’s
FDA investigational device exemption [IDE] designates the iStent as a
category B device). The Micro-Shunt has received regulatory approval
in Europe. These are not FDA approved for use in the U.S. at this time.
Note: Not discussed in this policy are the AquaFlow™ Collagen
Glaucoma Drainage Device, which received FDA premarket approval in 2001
for the maintenance of sub-scleral space following non-penetrating deep
sclerectomy, and the Ex-PRESS™ Mini Glaucoma Shunt, which received
510(k) marketing clearance in 2003 to transport aqueous fluid from the
anterior chamber of the eye into a conjunctival bleb.
Policy/Criteria
Insertion of an anterior segment aqueous drainage device (e.g., trabecular
shunt) without an extraocular reservoir is considered investigational
as a method to reduce intraocular pressure in patients with glaucoma.
Canaloplasty is considered investigational as a method
to reduce intraocular pressure in patients with glaucoma.
Scientific Background
A search of the MEDLINE database was performed through
June 2008 and found minimal data regarding the use
of either trabecular shunts or canaloplasty for the
treatment of glaucoma.
Trabecular Shunts
To date, the published literature on aqueous drainage devices consists of small
case series. (2-4) A number of clinical trials are in progress, and the iStent
is being studied under a FDA category B investigational device exemption. (5)
None of these devices has been approved by the FDA. Therefore, insertion of
drainage devices for glaucoma is considered investigational.
Canaloplasty
Lewis et al. reported interim data analysis from a company-sponsored
multi-center safety/efficacy study on canaloplasty using
the iTrack microcatheter. (6) Catheterization of the
canal was achieved in 83 of 94 patients enrolled (88%);
tension sutures were successfully placed in 74 patients
(79%) with a mean IOP of 24 mm Hg. At 3-month follow-up,
57 patients (77% of 74 implanted) had an IOP of 16 mm
Hg, and at 12 months 48 patients (65%) had a mean IOP
of 15 mm Hg. Ten ocular adverse events (11%) were reported,
including hyphema (3%), elevated IOP (3%), Descemet’s
membrane detachment, hypotony, choroidal effusion, and
exposed closure suture (1% each). Eleven patients (12%)
had a subconjunctival bleb, 6 of which resolved by 3-months.
The study design includes 5-year follow-up. These results
are limited by the lack of randomization and high loss
to follow-up. Evidence is insufficient to permit conclusions
concerning the effect of canaloplasty on health outcomes.
Therefore, this procedure is considered investigational.
References
- BlueCross BlueShield Association Medical Policy
Reference Manual, Policy No. 9.03.21
- Spiegel D, Wetzel W, Haffner DS et al. Initial
clinical experience with the trabecular micro-bypass
stent in patients with glaucoma. Adv Ther 2007;
24(1):161-70
- Spiegel D, Kobuch K. Trabecular meshwork bypass
tube shunt: initial case series. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002;86(11):1228-31
- Dietlein TS, Jordan JF, Schild A et al. Combined
cataract-glaucoma surgery using the intracanalicular
Eyepass glaucoma implant: first clinical results
of a prospective pilot study. J Cataract Refract
Surg 2008; 34(2):247-52
- http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/results?term=glaucoma+AND+shunt (Verified
8/25/08)
- Lewis RA, von Wolff K, Tetz M et al. Canaloplasty:
circumferential viscodilation and tensioning of Schlemm's
canal using a flexible microcatheter for the treatment
of open-angle glaucoma in adults: interim clinical
study analysis. J Cataract Refract Surg 2007;
33(7):1217-26
Cross References
None
| Codes |
Number |
Description |
| CPT |
0177T |
Transluminal dilation of aqueous
outflow canal; with retention of device or stent |
| |
0191T |
Insertion of anterior segment
aqueous drainage device, without extraocular
reservoir; internal approach |
| |
0192T |
Insertion of anterior segment
aqueous drainage device, without extraocular
reservoir; external approach |
| HCPCS |
None |
|
Surgery Section Table of Contents 

|